🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the nation's top court permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that may create up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to overturn a lower court's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably classified voters according to their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to employ the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Opposition

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action occurs during a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican control. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic leaders criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House leader stated the court had another time damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.