🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.