🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.