🔗 Share this article

Twelve months back, the landscape was completely separate. Before the national election, thoughtful Americans could acknowledge the nation's serious imperfections – its unfairness and imbalance – yet they continued to perceive it as the US. A free society. A land where legal governance held significance. A nation led by a dignified and upright leader, even with his elderly years and growing weakness.

These days, in late October 2025, countless Americans scarcely know the country we live in. People alleged as illegal immigrants are detained and shoved into transport, sometimes refused legal rights. The eastern section of the “people’s house” – is being torn down for a grotesque dance hall. The leader is targeting his opponents or alleged foes and insisting legal authorities surrender a massive sum of taxpayer money. Uniformed troops are being sent to US urban areas with deceptive justifications. The military command, renamed the Department of War, has – in effect – rid itself of regular press examination as it spends possibly reaching nearly $1tn in public funds. Institutions, attorney offices, news companies are buckling under the president’s threats, and wealthy elites are handled as members of the royal family.

“The United States, just months before its 250-year mark as the world’s leading democracy, has crossed the edge toward dictatorship and extremism,” Garrett Graff, stated in August. “Finally, swifter than I thought feasible, it did happen in this country.”

Every morning starts with fresh terrors. And it's hard to comprehend – and agonizing to acknowledge – how severely declined our nation is, and the rapid pace with which it unfolded.

However, we know that Trump was legitimately chosen. Even after his profoundly alarming previous administration and following the warnings linked to the awareness of the conservative plan – following the leader directly said publicly he planned to act as an autocrat solely at the start – sufficient voters selected him instead of Kamala Harris.

While alarming as the present situation is, it's more frightening to understand that we have only been several months under this leadership. What will another 36 months of this deterioration position us? And suppose that timeframe transforms into something even longer, as there is no one to stop this ruler from opting that another term is required, possibly for security concerns?

Certainly, there is still hope. There are legislative votes the coming year that may create a new governmental control, should Democrats regain one or both houses of parliament. There exist public servants who are attempting to exert some accountability, like representatives currently initiating an inquiry into the attempted cash appropriation from the justice department.

And a presidential election in the next cycle could start us down the road to recovery precisely as last year’s election set us on this regrettable path.

There exist countless citizens marching in the streets of their cities, similar to recent recently in the No Kings rallies.

A former official, stated lately that “the slumbering force of the nation is stirring”, exactly as before post-McCarthyism during the fifties or throughout the sixties activism or in the seventies crisis.

During those times, the listing ship finally returned to balance.

He claims he recognizes the indicators of that awakening and sees it happening at present. As support, he references the recent massive protests, the broad, multi-faction opposition regarding a personality's dismissal and the near-unanimous refusal by journalists to sign the defense department’s demands they solely cover authorized information.

“The dormant force perpetually exists asleep before some venality becomes so noxious, a particular deed so contemptuous of the common good, specific cruelty so noisy, that he has no choice except to rise.”

It’s an optimistic take, and I appreciate his knowledgeable stance. Possibly he may be validated.

In the meantime, the major inquiries endure: will the nation return to normalcy? Can it retrieve its position in the world and its devotion to legal principles?

Or must we acknowledge that the historical project succeeded temporarily, and then – abruptly, completely – collapsed?

My pessimistic brain tells me that the second option is accurate; that everything might be gone. My optimistic spirit, however, advises me that we need to strive, by any means we can.

For me, as an observer of the press, that involves pushing media professionals to live up, more fully, to their purpose of overseeing leadership. For different individuals, it might involve working on congressional campaigns, or organizing rallies, or finding ways to safeguard voting rights.

Less than a year ago, we lived in a very different place. Twelve months later? Or in several years? The reality is, we cannot predict. Our sole course is try to not give up.

What’s Giving Me Encouragement Today

The engagement I encounter in the classroom with new media professionals, that are simultaneously visionary and realistic, {always